Navy Official Criticizes Aid Worker, Leading to Apology

The aid worker, P'Kan', describes receiving a call from a senior Navy official that left him feeling demoralized and unappreciated.

P'Kan' is asked to detail the phone call from the Navy official and the events of the previous night.

The official stated he speaks directly, leading P'Kan' to also adopt a direct approach in their conversation.

P'Kan' explains his actions at the border were driven by a sense of brotherhood and long-standing good relations with the Navy.

P'Kan' discusses how the call affected his morale, feeling his efforts were not recognized.

The Commander of the Marine Infantry calls to apologize for the incident and the behavior of his subordinate.

P'Kan' expresses that he was able to have an open conversation and understand perspectives.

P'Kan' details the events at the border, explaining his role in de-escalating a confrontation with Cambodian soldiers.

He explains how he intervened to prevent a shooting and urged the Cambodian soldiers to withdraw.

P'Kan' highlights that his intervention led to the situation being resolved without violence.

He clarifies that while others have roles, his intervention was necessary due to the escalating situation.

P'Kan' mentions negative comments made about his subordinates but chooses not to repeat them to avoid further hurt.

The discussion touches on public perception of his actions and the nature of the calls received.

P'Kan' questions the authority of a Cambodian official and the implication that his presence was illegal.

He responds by offering to step aside if someone with a higher position wishes to take over his work.

P'Kan' details his ongoing efforts and financial contributions to support soldiers on the border.

The importance of national unity and collective effort in supporting the military is emphasized.

He questions why he was singled out for criticism when others have also assisted without being questioned.

P'Kan' mentions that another official had spoken with him before the incident.

A question arises about potential security threats from Cambodian BHQ entering Thailand.

P'Kan' states he has no information about BHQ entering Thailand and is not worried but remains cautious.

He assures that he has a team for security and has experience dealing with influential figures.

P'Kan' expresses confidence and a lack of concern, emphasizing his commitment to his work.

He reflects on his life as fulfilling, inspiring others to contribute to society and the nation.

P'Kan' clarifies that only the Commander of the Marine Infantry has apologized so far.

He considers the apology from the Commander sufficient, valuing the gesture of sportsmanship.

P'Kan' reiterates his request for the criticizing official to speak with him before making judgments.

The Commander has reportedly spoken to the official and advised against such behavior.

The importance of having supporters rather than detractors is highlighted.

P'Kan' recounts numerous instances of helping soldiers and resolving issues discreetly.

His behind-the-scenes work aims to prevent damage to the reputation of organizations and public trust.

P'Kan' shares his work to inform relevant parties and encourages those who find it beneficial to continue supporting.

He offers to handle public relations if any agencies prefer to keep their involvement private.

P'Kan' confirms he has not lost motivation and remains dedicated to his cause.

He emphasizes that his efforts primarily benefit frontline soldiers, especially the lower ranks.

P'Kan' details specific improvements made to soldiers' living conditions, from basic amenities to personal comfort.

He expresses hope that those who see the value in his work will continue to offer their support.