Navy Official Berates Aid Worker Over Border Incident; Apology Issued

The report introduces two significant events: the conflict between Kan Chom Palang and a mysterious phone call, and the ongoing issue of Cambodian oil tankers.

Kan Chom Palang posts on Facebook about a late-night call from a senior naval officer, expressing his disappointment and resolve to speak frankly.

The report details the prior smooth cooperation between Kan and the Navy, and how the recent transfer of a Marine commander became a point of contention.

Kan clarifies that the call was not to thank him but was critical, suggesting the officer lacked full understanding of the border situation.

Information from a military source suggests the call originated from a high-ranking officer within the Marine Corps, tasked by his superior to apologize.

It's revealed that the call was from a Marine officer, directed by the Commander of the Marine Corps, to apologize to Kan for his support of the Marines.

Kan recounts the events on the container ship, where he felt compelled to intervene due to escalating tensions and threats from Cambodian soldiers.

The exact words of the naval officer's call are revealed, expressing displeasure at Kan's presence and actions at the border.

Kan responds frankly, explaining that the situation involved escalating emotions, armed Cambodian soldiers, and provocations that pushed Thai forces to their limit.

Kan details how Cambodian soldiers were armed and provocative, leading him to intervene by setting up container barriers to prevent further conflict.

Kan expresses his hurt and anger at the criticism, questioning why his efforts to support the marines were met with such a response.

The Commander of the Royal Thai Marine Corps personally calls Kan to apologize for the inappropriate behavior of his subordinate.

Kan reiterates his disappointment with the initial call, feeling his efforts were misunderstood and unappreciated.

Kan highlights his extensive work and positive relationships with the Navy, emphasizing his commitment to supporting soldiers.

Kan confirms the Marine Corps Commander's direct apology, emphasizing the commander's respect and disapproval of the subordinate's actions.

Kan asks the officer to review the full context of the border incident before making judgments about his actions.

The report questions Kan's role as a civilian intervening in military matters, while Kan defends his actions as necessary for de-escalation.

The report highlights how Kan's initiatives, like installing container barriers, have been beneficial for the marines' safety.

The report questions the lack of adequate protection for the marines, implying Kan's intervention was a necessary response to a dangerous situation.

The report addresses the criticism Kan faced for his actions, questioning why intervening to protect Thai soldiers was met with disapproval.

Kan is presented as a representative of those who donate to support soldiers, highlighting the tangible results of their contributions.

The report shows that many marines are grateful for Kan's assistance, as evidenced by the recognition he has received.

The report points to Kan's protective gear and the numerous commendations he has received as proof of his dedication to supporting the military.

The report contrasts Kan's tangible contributions, like providing electricity and water, with the criticism he received.

The report questions how the public will perceive the naval officer's actions, given Kan's significant contributions to the soldiers.

The report clarifies that the intention is not to blindly defend Kan, but to question the basis of the criticism against him.

The Navy's spokesperson confirms that the central command does not share the critical view and has consistently thanked Kan for his support.

The report details Kan's previous contributions, such as providing water and electricity to naval bases, which were crucial due to budget delays.

The Navy spokesperson reassures Kan, stating that his good deeds will protect him and that the Navy appreciates his contributions.

Kan reveals he also handles sensitive cases of mistreatment within the military, resolving them discreetly to avoid public controversy.

Kan explains his role in ensuring fairness for lower-ranking soldiers who face unjust treatment within the military.

Kan challenges his critics, questioning why he is being reprimanded for intervening in a situation involving Cambodian soldiers.

The report suggests that without Kan's intervention, the border situation, including the presence of illegal activities, would have worsened.

The report mentions audio clips from social media used to provoke, including a message suggesting Thais visit Cambodia if they like it so much.

The report concludes by emphasizing the importance of supporting and protecting individuals like Kan who act heroically.

The report raises questions about the recent controversial events, including the transfer of a commander and the mysterious phone call, suggesting a fear of truth emerging.