Thailand Leverages Land Claims Against Cambodia's Maritime Push

The video begins by criticizing Cambodia's perceived impatience and disregard for Thailand's feelings in bilateral discussions regarding UNCLOS maritime boundaries.

Thailand's response to Cambodia's move towards compulsory conciliation is to refuse bilateral talks and also to halt discussions on land border demarcation (JBC).

Thailand plans to use its advantage in land border demarcation to pressure Cambodia's expedited maritime claims, effectively using land gains to counter maritime demands.

Cambodia submitted a letter to the UN regarding maritime claims but then refused to follow UNCLOS procedures for bilateral negotiations.

Cambodia has closed the door on bilateral negotiations, while simultaneously expressing a desire to discuss the Joint Border Committee (JBC) with Thailand.

Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin stated that Thailand is not in a hurry to negotiate with Cambodia, indicating no immediate pressure.

Dr. Duriyapap Precharat explains Cambodia's efforts to gain an advantage while Thailand aims for new bilateral talks under UNCLOS after revoking MOU 44.

Cambodia skipped the initial bilateral negotiation step and proceeded directly to compulsory conciliation, forming a committee to select a chairperson.

Thailand can also pressure Cambodia by refusing to discuss maritime issues until Cambodia agrees to bilateral talks, creating a stalemate.

The land border dispute, where Cambodia has lost territory to Thailand, now serves as an additional bargaining chip for Thailand.

Thailand retaliates by refusing to discuss the JBC and keeping border crossings closed, mirroring Cambodia's tactics.

Thailand intends to use its land border advantage to pressure Cambodia's maritime claims, teaching Cambodia a lesson and making its fight difficult.

Cambodia is pursuing its national interests and viewing Thailand as an adversary, necessitating a full-effort counter-strategy.

Thailand revoked MOU 44 to pursue bilateral negotiations under the UNCLOS framework, emphasizing legal principles for maritime boundary delimitation.

The first step under UNCLOS involves direct bilateral negotiations between the two countries before involving any third party.

Cambodia bypassed the initial bilateral negotiation step and moved directly to compulsory conciliation, forming a committee to select a chairperson.

Cambodia's actions suggest they believe this expedited process will give them an advantage, leading to a firm stance.

Thailand is preparing its counter-strategies, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reportedly well-equipped to handle the situation.

Cambodia prefers third-party involvement and compulsory conciliation through UNCLOS mechanisms rather than direct bilateral talks.

Thailand emphasizes that its revocation of MOU 44 was to facilitate bilateral talks under UNCLOS, not to involve third parties prematurely.

Thailand believes its approach is correct and appropriate, following the established procedures under UNCLOS for dispute resolution.

The expert advises Thailand to maintain its stance and clearly communicate it to the UN and relevant bodies, while acknowledging Cambodia's chosen path.

If Cambodia insists on compulsory conciliation, Thailand possesses other tools to pressure Cambodia, such as leveraging land border advantages.

The historical land border dispute, where Cambodia lost territory to Thailand, provides Thailand with significant leverage in the current negotiations.

Thailand argues that Cambodia's actions demonstrate the necessity of bilateral talks, as Cambodia's reliance on third parties undermines trust.

Thailand will not participate in Cambodia's compulsory conciliation process, nor will it discuss the JBC or reopen border crossings.

Thailand aims to use its land advantage and current tactics to teach Cambodia a lesson and impede its desired progress.

Cambodia has appointed two experts, including a former Danish diplomat and former UNCLOS president, to aid their case.

The expert is not concerned about Cambodia's appointments, believing Thailand has strong hidden strategies, evidenced by its cancellation of MOU 44.

The expert believes the Thai government is fully prepared with multiple plans, including legal consultations in France.

Both countries have the right to lobby and invite legal experts to represent their interests in international forums.

Thailand's bold move to revoke MOU 44 suggests they possess significant undisclosed strengths and strategies.

The Thai government is believed to have comprehensive plans and strategies in place to counter Cambodia's actions.

The legal experts consulted by Thailand are reportedly highly qualified and experienced, adding to Thailand's strategic advantage.

While confident, Thailand remains cautious and prepared for all potential scenarios in the ongoing dispute.

A promotional segment encourages viewers to become members of Top News for exclusive benefits and to support the channel.

Viewers are encouraged to support Top News by using the 'Super Thanks' feature to contribute financially.