iLaw Denounces ECT Decision on 2024 Senate Election Rigging

iLaw explains its process of observing the Senate election from the district to the national level.

Discussion of the 'yellow shirt' groups, the use of cheat sheets, and unnatural voting patterns.

iLaw concludes that a large-scale operation was established to ensure 120-150 pre-determined candidates became senators.

iLaw links the rigging operation to the Bhumjaithai Party, citing evidence involving party officials and specific hotels.

iLaw expresses anger and lack of surprise that the ECT decided not to prosecute party executives.

Claims that the ECT leadership's origins are tied to the very senators being accused.

Breaking down the number of people sued versus those cleared, arguing that only 'small fish' were targeted.

Explaining how some candidates were caught due to clumsy use of PromptPay or cash transfers.

Detailed look at Senator Sorachat's high vote count and the money trail in Nong Bua Lamphu.

iLaw argues that those on the cheat sheet cannot be innocent just because they lacked a digital money trail.

Final statement that the ECT's partial prosecutions prove that the 2024 Senate election was indeed fraudulent.