ECT Minority Member Reveals Internal Divide Over Senate Collusion Case

Sithichot discusses the need for transparency regarding majority and minority votes in ECT decisions.

Explanation of why the votes were not unanimous for charges 1 and 2 involving party executives.

Discussion of 'cheat sheets' found in provinces like Nakhon Si Thammarat and Phuket.

Analysis of witness testimonies and the role of party personnel in coordinating the fraud.

Details about a meeting on the 21st in Bangkok to determine Senate leadership.

Sithichot argues that witnesses who changed their stories were not coerced but are unreliable.

Response to questions about whether his disclosure is a defense against Section 157 charges.

Clarification on which candidates' cases were unanimous and which were split.

Discussion on money transfers and the role of DSI in pursuing money laundering cases.

Addressing claims that ministers were the architects of the collusion scheme.

Explaining why evidence is hard to find due to the secrecy of the collusion meetings.

Reference to CCTV footage from June 26 showing voters using cheat sheets.

Explaining the necessity of joint cooperation with DSI and police to break the silence of witnesses.

Distinguishing between personal memory aids and fraudulent coordinated lists.

Possibilities for the Supreme Court to consider additional evidence or for victims to sue.

Discussion on the legal precedents regarding candidates applying in the wrong professional group.

Addressing whether ECT members were involved in collecting the cheat sheets.

Sithichot concludes by stating his goal was to prevent public misunderstanding of the ECT's unity.