Amulet Appraisal Dispute: Ton Bang Khae Denies Wrongdoing Amidst Loan Scandal

Ton Bang Khae, a famous amulet dealer, voluntarily visits the police to deny allegations related to a loan and amulet collateral, seeking to prove his innocence.

Ton Bang Khae's representative states he is ready to fight the accusations and has already filed complaints, emphasizing he is not evading the process.

The number of individuals involved in the debt has reportedly decreased. The valuation of amulets used as collateral is a key point of contention.

Ton Bang Khae explains the fluctuating market value of amulets and questions why the creditor accepted the collateral if its value was insufficient.

The involvement of a 40-year experienced appraiser and Ou Krung Siam is mentioned. Questions arise about why the alleged undervaluation was only noticed a year later.

Speculation that Ton Bang Khae might be acting on behalf of someone to target 'Big Tao' is addressed.

Journalists encounter Pol. Gen. Surachate Hakparn (Big Joke) at the police headquarters, leading to questions about his presence.

Big Joke clarifies he is there for his own case and denies any connection or coordination with Ton Bang Khae's situation.

The CSD Commander confirms awareness of the amulet debt case and states the police are investigating potential fraud.

The total fraud amount could potentially exceed 5,000 million baht, involving a complex network of individuals.

The CSD Commander confirms he has spoken with 'Big Tao' who provided an explanation consistent with his public statements.

Photos of Ton Bang Khae with Gen. Nirandorn are circulating, though Gen. Nirandorn denies personal acquaintance.

The report highlights discrepancies between Ton Bang Khae's statements and those of Madame Keng, particularly regarding debt payments.

Ou Krung Siam, a friend of Madame Keng and acquaintance of Ton Bang Khae, is interviewed to provide insights into the case.

Ou Krung Siam emphasizes that the actions of a few should not tarnish the reputation of the entire amulet community.

Ton Bang Khae claims no checks bounced and that payments were made in advance, contradicting Madame Keng's account.

Two individuals have already been charged, with more expected as the investigation progresses.

The amounts involved are substantial, raising questions about Madame Keng's wealth and the nature of the transactions.

The interviewer expresses a desire to speak with 'Tao', an amulet expert, who was allegedly present during the collateral appraisal.

Big Tao is reportedly facing charges under Section 157, related to alleged corruption.

Big Tao's reputation as an honest and effective police officer is highlighted, along with his denial of any wrongdoing.

Big Tao is considering legal action for defamation against those who have accused him.

The case may involve elements of money laundering due to the significant sums and complex transactions.

Big Tao states that arrest warrants can be issued for those involved, and amulet experts will be summoned for questioning.

Madame Keng is reportedly distressed by the situation and apologizes for causing trouble for Big Tao.

The CSD has the authority to investigate cases nationwide, and this case is considered significant.

The total damage could exceed 5,000 million baht, with more than 8 individuals potentially involved.

Madame Keng's family is involved in a successful steel export business, known for high-quality materials.

Madame Keng has also been involved in building resorts and providing housing for employees at low or no interest.

Big Tao details the investigation starting in early 2068 BE, involving alleged fraud and leading to charges against two individuals.

The investigation expanded to include Ton Bang Khae, with evidence suggesting his involvement in the alleged fraud.

The fraud reportedly involves the sale of amulets, with a complex scheme of payments and subsequent defaults.

Big Tao differentiates between honest amulet dealers and a group he labels 'paper amulet dealers' involved in fraudulent activities.

Ton Bang Khae maintains his innocence and has presented evidence to the police, with no charges yet filed against him.

The video replays Ton Bang Khae's statements questioning the delayed discovery of the amulets' alleged undervaluation.

Ou Krung Siam explains that Ton Bang Khae initially appraised the amulets for a total value, not individually, and the process was for collateral.

Ou clarifies that the initial collateral was valued at 180 million baht in total, and individual appraisals came later.

Ou states that Ton Bang Khae was responsible for appraising each amulet individually.

Ou explains that amulet valuations can be subjective and fluctuate, and the owner has the right to set a price.

Ou notes that amulets lack a fixed market price, making owner-set valuations common.

The initial valuation was a collective figure, not an itemized list of each amulet's worth.

The discussion returns to the conflicting accounts of debt payments, specifically regarding bounced checks.

Ou suggests that the status of checks (bounced or not) can be easily verified with the documents.

Ou clarifies Ton's statement about 'no bounced checks' by differentiating between various debt components and prior issues.

Ou questions whether Ton Bang Khae acted too impulsively by filing a complaint.

Ou expresses a desire for a peaceful resolution, as he knows both parties involved.

The conversation focuses on the point where the dispute escalated from a debt issue to a conflict involving police.

Ou expresses confusion about how the situation escalated to involve accusations against police officials.

Discrepancies emerge regarding who initiated the meeting between Ton Bang Khae and Big Tao.

Ou acknowledges that some may question if Ton Bang Khae is acting on behalf of others.

Ou reiterates that Ton Bang Khae requested the meeting on April 17th.

Ou insists the conflict did not originate from Big Tao but rather Ton Bang Khae initiated contact.

Ou discusses the possibility of mediation or awaiting police charges to resolve the dispute.

Ou offers his perspective on how Madame Keng and Ton Bang Khae might approach the situation.

Ou describes Madame Keng as easy to talk to and willing to compromise.

Ou suggests Ton Bang Khae is likely to pursue the matter assertively.

Ou addresses the negative impact of the case on the amulet community's reputation.

Ou urges the public not to judge the entire amulet community based on the actions of a few individuals.

Ou believes the amulet community's popularity remains strong, despite recent negative events.

Ou emphasizes that open communication is the best way to resolve issues within the amulet community.