Wat proposes Minimum Period for prison sentence reductions

Post Today•Politics•1d ago

Reader Briefing

Independent scholar Wat Tingsamit proposes a 'Minimum Period' system to prevent excessive sentence reductions and ensure court judgments are meaningfully enforced.

•Wat Tingsamit proposes implementing a Minimum Period to establish a clear boundary between court sentencing and administrative penalty management.
•The proposal suggests amending the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code to allow courts to specify minimum actual imprisonment terms.
•Under the proposal, death sentences reduced to life imprisonment could require at least 25 years of actual jail time, while life sentences could be set at a minimum of 20 years.
•Wat Tingsamit suggests the Judicial Administration Commission (G.B.S.) study four key issues, including who determines the period and how post-release monitoring is handled.

Overview

•Wat Tingsamit identifies a problem where multiple layers of sentence reduction cause serious offenders to serve significantly shorter terms than society understands from court judgments.
•Wat Tingsamit proposes a Minimum Period system where the Department of Corrections or the executive branch cannot reduce sentences below a court-specified minimum.
•The Minimum Period is intended to maintain the weight of court judgments and build public confidence in the judicial process.
•Wat Tingsamit clarifies that reaching the Minimum Period does not grant immediate release but only initiates the eligibility for release consideration based on risk assessments.
•The proposal includes post-release measures such as EM bracelets or measures under the Repeating Offender Prevention Act 2022.
•The proposal draws comparisons from the United Kingdom's Minimum Term and Whole Life Order, as well as systems in Canada and Australia.
•Wat Tingsamit suggests a short-term approach of amending the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code before considering a long-term structural legal overhaul.
•Wat Tingsamit proposes that the G.B.S. working group study the determination of the period, the duration of the minimum term, the decision-maker for release, and post-release monitoring.

Full article content is available on the original source.

Read on Post Today (Thai Version)View in Google Translate

Source: Post Today (Original)

Key Entities

Person

Wat Tingsamit(วัส ติงสมิตร)

An independent scholar who proposed the Minimum Period concept for sentencing.

Organization

Department of Corrections(กรมราชทัณฑ์)ℹ️

The agency responsible for the administration of penalties and prison management.

G.B.S.(ก.บ.ศ.)

The commission whose working group Wat Tingsamit suggests should study the four key issues of the proposal.

Place

United Kingdom(สหราชอาณาจักร)ℹ️

A country mentioned for its use of Minimum Terms and Whole Life Orders in sentencing.

Canada(แคนาดา)ℹ️

A country mentioned for separating sentencing from penalty administration.

Australia(ออสเตรเลีย)ℹ️

A country mentioned for separating sentencing from penalty administration.

Law

Criminal Code(ประมวลกฎหมายอาญา)ℹ️

The law proposed for amendment to allow courts to specify minimum actual imprisonment periods.

Criminal Procedure Code(ประมวลกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความอาญา)ℹ️

The law proposed for amendment to allow courts to specify minimum actual imprisonment periods.

Repeating Offender Prevention Act 2022(พ.ร.บ.มาตรการป้องกันการกระทำความผิดซ้ำฯ พ.ศ. 2565)

The law governing post-release monitoring measures for offenders.

Policy

Minimum Period

A proposed system to establish a minimum actual sentence that cannot be reduced by administrative powers.